For information about COVID-19, including symptoms and prevention, please read our COVID-19 patient guide. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts against the pandemic.

Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

TitleEffects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsBrenner SK, Kaushal R, Grinspan Z, Joyce C, Kim I, Allard RJ, Delgado D, Abramson EL
JournalJ Am Med Inform Assoc
Volume23
Issue5
Pagination1016-36
Date Published2016 09
ISSN1527-974X
KeywordsHumans, Medical Informatics, Patient Safety, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review studies assessing the effects of health information technology (health IT) on patient safety outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement methods. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health (CINAHL), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from 2001 to June 2012, were searched. Descriptive and comparative studies were included that involved use of health IT in a clinical setting and measured effects on patient safety outcomes.

RESULTS: Data on setting, subjects, information technology implemented, and type of patient safety outcomes were all abstracted. The quality of the studies was evaluated by 2 independent reviewers (scored from 0 to 10). A total of 69 studies met inclusion criteria. Quality scores ranged from 1 to 9. There were 25 (36%) studies that found benefit of health IT on direct patient safety outcomes for the primary outcome measured, 43 (62%) studies that either had non-significant or mixed findings, and 1 (1%) study for which health IT had a detrimental effect. Neither the quality of the studies nor the rate of randomized control trials performed changed over time. Most studies that demonstrated a positive benefit of health IT on direct patient safety outcomes were inpatient, single-center, and either cohort or observational trials studying clinical decision support or computerized provider order entry.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Many areas of health IT application remain understudied and the majority of studies have non-significant or mixed findings. Our study suggests that larger, higher quality studies need to be conducted, particularly in the long-term care and ambulatory care settings.

URLhttps://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/23/5/1016/2379772
Alternate JournalJ Am Med Inform Assoc
PubMed ID26568607
Grant ListK12 NS066274 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
Category: 
Faculty Publication