For information about COVID-19, including symptoms and prevention, please read our COVID-19 patient guide. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts against the pandemic.

Physician Networks and Ambulatory Care-sensitive Admissions.

TitlePhysician Networks and Ambulatory Care-sensitive Admissions.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsCasalino LP, Pesko MF, Ryan AM, Nyweide DJ, Iwashyna TJ, Sun X, Mendelsohn J, Moody J
JournalMed Care
Volume53
Issue6
Pagination534-41
Date Published2015 Jun
ISSN1537-1948
KeywordsAged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Community Networks, Continental Population Groups, Female, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Medicare, Physicians, Primary Care, Referral and Consultation, United States
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on the quality and cost of care traditionally focuses on individual physicians or medical groups. Social network theory suggests that the care a patient receives also depends on the network of physicians with whom a patient's physician is connected.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study are: (1) identify physician networks; (2) determine whether the rate of ambulatory care-sensitive hospital admissions (ACSAs) varies across networks--even different networks at the same hospital; and (3) determine the relationship between ACSA rates and network characteristics.

RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified networks by applying network detection algorithms to Medicare 2008 claims for 987,000 beneficiaries in 5 states. We estimated a fixed-effects model to determine the relationship between networks and ACSAs and a multivariable model to determine the relationship between network characteristics and ACSAs.

RESULTS: We identified 417 networks. Mean size: 129 physicians; range, 26-963. In the fixed-effects model, ACSA rates varied significantly across networks: there was a 46% difference in rates between networks at the 25th and 75th performance percentiles. At 95% of hospitals with admissions from 2 networks, the networks had significantly different ACSA rates; the mean difference was 36% of the mean ACSA rate. Networks with a higher percentage of primary-care physicians and networks in which patients received care from a larger number of physicians had higher ACSA rates.

CONCLUSIONS: Physician networks have a relationship with ACSAs that is independent of the physicians in the network. Physician networks could be an important focus for understanding variations in medical care and for intervening to improve care.

DOI10.1097/MLR.0000000000000365
Alternate JournalMed Care
PubMed ID25906013
Category: 
Faculty Publication